H1N1, the False Pandemic, Reports Pravda

The Jane Burgermeister Archive

Wednesday, 13 January 2010 13:21

News - Latest News

< Prev		Next >

H1N1, the False Pandemic
13.01.2010

URL: http://english.pravda.ru/science/health/111631-falsepandemic-0

Wolfgang Wodarg, Head of Health at the Council of Europe, considers that the A H1N1 scare was a “campaign of panic”, a “false pandemic”, “one of the great medicine scandals of the century” and claims that the vaccines, based on cancerous cells, spell the chilling message “there is worse to come”.

For Wolfgang Wodarg, the pandemic of A H1N1, which started as Mexican Flu, then Swine Flu, was no more and no less than a campaign to create a false notion of insecurity for the pharmaceutical companies to cash in. “The great campaign of panic we have seen provided a golden opportunity for representatives from labs who knew they would hit the jackpot in the case of a pandemic being declared,” he declared.

Claiming that the “pandemic” is “one of the great medicine scandals of the century,” Dr. Wodarg has called for an enquiry. The resolution he proposed for an investigation into the role of the pharma companies in the A H1N1 story has been passed by the Council of Europe, which is based in Strasbourg. An emergency debate will be held at the end of January.

“We want to clarify everything that brought about this massive operation of disinformation. We want to know who made decisions, on the basis of what evidence, and precisely how the influence of the pharmaceutical industry came to bear on the decision-making,” declared Dr. Wodarg, adding that a group of people in the World Health Organization “is associated very closely with the pharmaceutical industry”.

Are the vaccines dangerous?

Regarding the vaccines, Dr. Wodarg delivered some chilling statements in an interview with the French publication L’Humanité on Sunday: “The vaccines were developed too quickly. Some ingredients were insufficiently tested. But there is worse to come. The vaccine developed by Novartis was produced in a bioreactor from cancerous cells, a technique that had never been used until now”.

The health expert added that this was not necessary and huge quantities of public money were squandered as a result, developing a vaccine which has not followed the usual processes in place in national and international public institutions: “The latter are now discredited because millions of people have been vaccinated with products with inherent possible health risks”.

Pharma companies made billions from mass hysteria

Wolfgang Wodarg further accused the makers of antiflu drugs and vaccines of influencing the WHO’s decision to call a global pandemic, facilitating the implanting of mechanisms which in turn generated billions of dollars in profits. The British Department of Health, for example, set up special procedures, suspended normal rules, told national and local authorities to prepare for 65,000 deaths, prepare the morgues for record numbers of fatalities and instructed the armed forces to be on stand-by.

The result was less than 5,000 cases and 251 deaths, the vast majority of which occurred in patients with serious underlying chronic health problems, or a death rate 260 times less than that expected.

The seeds had been sown

For Dr. Wodarg, the seeds were sown five years ago with the warning that H5N1, avian flu, could develop a human-to-human transmissible form. According to the health expert, Governments then began panic stockpiling for the eventuality of a pandemic and placed “sleeper contracts” which would be activated automatically once a pandemic had been called by the WHO.

For this reason, believes Dr. Wodarg, drug companies placed people inside the WHO mechanisms to facilitate the calling of the pandemic.

Timothy BANCROFT-HINCHEY

PRAVDA.Ru

Add this page to Social Bookmarking websites

Thank you for helping spreading the news!

Comments

Add New

RSS

Define: "there is worse to come"

Anon 2010-01-13 14:55:11

In the relevant context, Wolfgang Wodarg is referring to Novartis vaccine, Obta Flu, when he says: "Therefore, it cannot be ruled out that protein remains of a cancerous cell present in a vaccine manufactured in a bioreactor give rise to a tumor in the vaccinated person." I wanted to know what that meant and am passing along the findings.

Source: ( http://www.humaniteinenglish.com/spip.php?article1427 ) Influenza A: "They Organized a Psychosis" published by French media channel, L'Humanite; translated Monday 11 January 2010, by Leslie Thatcher (www.truthout.org) and reviewed by Henry Crapo

(excerpt)

What sort of risk did they unknowingly take then, these people in good health who had themselves vaccinated?

Wolfgang Wodarg: I repeat that the vaccines were developed too quickly, some additives inadequately tested. But there are more serious problems. The vaccine developed by Novartis was produced in a bioreactor from cancerous cells, a technique never used before now.

Obviously, I’m not a specialist, but how can someone make a vaccine from sick cells?

Wolfgang Wodarg: Normally, chicken eggs are used as the medium in which the viruses are grown. It’s necessary, in fact, to work with live cells, since the virus can multiply in that way only and consequently, by definition, the anti-viral preparations that go with them. But that procedure presents a major flaw; it’s slow; it requires many eggs. And it is long and complex on a technical level. Another technique with remarkable potential consists of growing the viruses on living cells in bioreactors. Cells that grow and divide very quickly are required for that. That’s approximately the procedure that is used to culture yogurt, which is also made in bioreactors, but in this context the cell has been so disrupted in its environment and its growth that it grows like a cancerous cell. And it’s on those high-yield cells that the virus is cultivated. Only to manufacture the vaccine, it is necessary to extract the viruses from those cells into which they have been implanted. And. consequently, it may happen that during the process of manufacturing the vaccine, residues from the cancerous cell remain in the preparation, as happens in the classic manufacture with eggs. So, we know that in the case of a vaccination against classic flu, secondary effects may appear in people allergic to the egg albumin found in egg whites. Therefore, it cannot be ruled out that protein remains of a cancerous cell present in a vaccine manufactured in a bioreactor give rise to a tumor in the vaccinated person. According to the true precautionary principle, therefore, it should have been necessary before such a product be authorized for commercial use to be 100 percent certain that such effects are actually out of the question.

And that wasn’t done?

Wolfgang Wodarg: That was not done. The EMA (European Medicines Agency), an institution based in London under the responsibility of the European Commissioner for the Economy, which gives the authorizations for putting vaccines on the market in Europe, gave its green light for the commercialization of this product, arguing, that, in this case, this manufacturing method did not constitute a "significant" risk. That was evaluated quite differently by numerous specialists here in Germany and by an independent medicine institution: they, on the contrary, raised the alarm and communicated their objections. I took those warnings seriously. I studied the file and intervened within the framework of the Bundestag Health Committee, to which I then belonged, so that the vaccine not be used in Germany. I made it known that I was certainly not opposed to the development of vaccines using that technique, but that it was first of all necessary to guarantee total harmlessness. So, the product was not used in Germany where the government rescinded the contract with Novartis.

What is the name of this vaccine?

Wolfgang Wodarg: Obta flu.

But that means that in other European countries such as France the product may be sold without any problem?

Wolfgang Wodarg: Yes, it obtained EMA authorization and may consequently be used throughout the European Union.

Reply Quote

Medical laboratory scientist

Emanuel van den Bemd 2010-01-13 20:22:46

When will people learn to give up on allopathic medicine which causes millions of Iatrogenic deaths each year and cures absolutely no one? Is n't it time we looked at the benefits of clinically significant nutrition instead of toxic medical drugs and vaccines . We must ban the use of most herbicides,pesticides and the numerous chemicals added to everything we handel, breathe and ingest. There is no hope for any of us if we continue to support the outrageous greed that we as a people are subjected to by the cartels and the self confessed depopulation addicts and new world order fanatics.They are so crazy that they put their own lives and that of their families at risk just so they can see their precious plan of a major world cull come to fruition. How mad is that? Who has any doubs now that UN and the WHO is controlled by a bunch of demented nutters.

Reply Quote