Thursday, September 02, 2010
   
Text Size

Site Search - enter your search term

Deutsch (DE-CH-AT)French (Fr)Svenska (Sverige)Nederlands - nl-NLPolish (Poland)English (United Kingdom)

Adverse reactions incidence "very common" with GSK's Pandemrix, admits EMEA document

News - Highlighted News


An EMEA document reveals that adverse reactions incidence were very common in GlaxoSmithKline's Pandemrix clinical trials.


http://www.emea.europa.eu/humandocs/PDFs/EPAR/pandemrix/emea-combined-h832en.pdf

The document says that "nervous system disorders" were "very common".

Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders were also very common as were general disorders.

Blood and lymphatic system disorders were also common.

The document also reveals that Pandemrix contains squalene, oil in water adjuvant responsible for the Gulf War Syndrome, in huge doses.

AS03 adjuvant composed of squalene (10.69 milligrams), DL-α-tocopherol (11.86 milligrams) and
polysorbate 80 (4.86 milligrams).

"No data have been generated in pregnant women with Pandemrix or with any other vaccine that contains the AS03 adjuvant," it says.

"Adverse reactions from clinical trials with the mock-up vaccine are listed here below (see section 5.1
for more information on mock-up vaccines).
Clinical studies have evaluated the incidence of adverse reactions listed belowin approximately 5,000
subjects 18 years old and above who received formulations containing at least 3.75 microgram
HA/AS03.
Adverse reactions reported are listed according to the following frequency:
Very common (≥1/10)
Common (≥1/100 to <1/10)
Uncommon (≥1/1,000 to <1/100)
Rare (≥1/10,000 to <1/1,000)
Very rare (<1/10,000)
Within each frequency grouping, undesirable effects are presented in order of decreasing seriousness.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Common: lymphadenopathy
Psychiatric disorders
Uncommon: insomnia
Nervous system disorders
Very common: headache
Uncommon: paraesthesia, somnolence, dizziness
Gastrointestinal disorders
Uncommon: gastro-intestinal symptoms (such as diarrhoea, vomiting, abdominal pain, nausea)
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Common: ecchymosis at the injection site, sweating increased
Uncommon: pruritus, rash
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Very common: arthralgia, myalgia
General disorders and administration site conditions
Very common: induration, swelling, pain and redness at the injection site, fever, fatigue
Common: shivering, influenza like illness, injection site reactions (such as warmth, pruritus)
Uncommon: malaise"





Add this page to Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Free and Open Source Software News Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! TwitThis Joomla Free PHP

Thank you for helping spreading the news!
Comments
Add New Search RSS
Pandemrix toxic waste by E P A standards
oO doctorno.blogetery.com Oo 2009-10-03 15:52:49

Pandemrix toxic waste by E P A standards
oO doctorno.blogetery.com Oo 2009-10-03 16:48:44
The perpetrators block keys on the keyboard so look out.

Disregard my other posts on this page please.


The amount of Thiomersal in the Pandemrix slow kill vaccine is enough to specify the (slow kill) vaccine as a biological weapon, toxic waste.

Thiomersal (INN) (C9H9HgNaO2S), or sodium ethylmercurithiosalicylate, commonly known in the United States as thimerosal, is an organomercury compound (approximately 49% mercury by weight).

It contains 5 micrograms thiomersal (organomercury compound (approximately 49% mercury by weight).

This means the Pandemrix slow kill vaccine contains about 2.5 micrograms of Mercury.

The Pandemrix vaccine contains 5000 parts per billion mercury, ten times less than the vaccine disgussed in the Mercury, autism and the global vaccine agenda video yet still 25 times the amount required to be classified as toxic waste by the E P A.

200 parts per billion of Mercury is defined as toxic waste by the E P A, meaning the Pandemrix vaccine is officially a biological weapon because the amount of Mercury in the Pandemrix vaccine is 5000 parts per billion, 25 times the amount required to be classified as toxic waste.

This means the Pandemrix vaccine is defined as toxic waste by the E P A.

'If a doctor would drop the vial on the floor it would be toxic waste but yet they are comfortable injecting this into infants.'


Verify it for your self and spread the information if correct, here is the video:

http://theflucase.com/index.php?%20option=com_content&view=article&id= 619%3Athe-question-about-%20depopulation-with-vaccines&catid=1%3Alates t-%20news&Itemid=64&lang=en#josc2103
What to do?
Janne Johannesen 2009-10-23 21:59:25

I am a nurse working in a hospital i Norway. At the moment the goverment puts a lot of pressure on people working in healthcare to go into the vacination program. In my unit only 5 wanted to take the vacination and now there are like 50. In newspapers there has been articles where they strongly appeal to our concious. It is almost like we are in charge of taking other peoples lives if we do`nt take pandremix. I really miss more information about this vacination. And i do think it is nessecary that they also speak about the long term risks. I have not yet decided to take the injection but i do feel the pressure that i should. All my co workers that has had pandremix changed their mind because of staetments in the newspapers for the last two days. I do not think it is right to label you almost like a murder if you choose not to. I am still thinking weaher i should or shouldn`t.
Im a nurse in England.
Royston 2009-10-29 00:26:44

Hi Janne,
I just happened to come across this document on the web.I feel you should defnately not take this dangerous shot.I am a staff nurse in England ,and im not having it,no way.
When you see the things put in the shot ,it is obvious that this is a very dangerous vaccine.If you would like to chat more here is my email,sungod724@yahoo.co.uk
Love and light
Royston.
B SHIPLEY 2009-12-17 20:43:20

HAD both the seasonal flu and swine flu as our trust suggested.
Wish i hadn't
projectile vomitting, unbelievable diarrhoea, lethargy, headache etc....
only symptoms i have had that were worse, was flu - when i was hospitalised.
Not enough warning, and especially that not trialed in combo
AS to the vomitting, i can recall all previous 3 times i have vomitted, so that is no mean reaction to get out of me.
Still feeling sick and headachy - and horrified to hear how many others are to.
Dr
Chris 2009-10-29 11:04:22

I've had my vaccines, Pandemrix and season flu today. No adverse reactions as yet.


Good Luck
Anna 2009-10-29 11:09:43

please report any adverse reactions and also keep an eye on your general health the coming four years. I really hope you will make it.
Ms.
Petra Sylvester-Smith 2009-10-29 17:21:59

I suffer from a very agressive strain of PPMS. Went from slight symptoms in Februar this year to being in a wheelchair, frequent loss of vision, total loss of my left hand (right hand catching up)within 7 month.

Should I take the vaccine?
Janne Johannesen 2009-10-29 21:35:14

I really can`t recomend you either because i already feel i know to litle about pandremix. But i can say that if i was at risk of dying getting the virus, i do think i would have done that. But it is hard to say for sure, since i am a helthy person at the moment. I am only sharing my thoughts, but plese do not read this as a recomandation. My best wishes for you!
Help!
Mina 2009-11-03 17:43:56

I am in the process of joining the United States Coast Guard. It is mandatory for all military personnel to take the H1N1 vaccine. I cant seem to find out which one... or if there is ANY way I can get out of taking it. Any info would be greatly appreciated.
dunno what to do?
jo 2009-11-10 16:36:13

I am 5 months pregnant and am due to have the pandemrix jab soon, To my knowledge it has not been tested on pregnant women. Which is the grater risk, getting swineflu and dying or something horrible happening to me or my baby as a result of the vaccine?
student
Marinna 2009-11-10 16:44:10

Listen to me- LOOK UP THE INGREDIENTS BEFORE YOU TAKE THE VACCINE. You will more than likely back away from it once you do! The chances of adverse side effects are high. One of risks are becoming STERILE. Dont risk harming your baby either. You are better off not taking the vaccine and risking getting the virus anyway, its the same as the normal flu, just a little worse. If you stay healthy, eat right, get rest and sunlight, you can get thru it. Trust me!!! I am not a conspiracy theorist, nor am I religious, I have simply done TONS of research on this particular vaccine and believe with all my heart that it is nothing but bad for the human body. Hopefully this helps you make your decision....
wrong
anna 2009-11-10 16:47:09

swine flu is less severe than normal flu. 500.000 dies from normal flu every year, so far only about 6000 have died from swine flu. The vaccine is guaranteed to introduce poisons in your boy, the infection gives life long immunity.... easy choice.
Write comment
Name:
Email:
 
Website:
Title:
UBBCode:
[b] [i] [u] [url] [quote] [code] [img] 
 
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.

Support www.theflucase.com

Help support www.theflucase.com
 
Your support helps us keep this site online
We have 100 guests online